Three generations

Anderson and Dron describe three generations of distance learning: cognitive-behaviourism; constructivism; connectivism. They note that other researchers have described these “three generations” in terms of the technologies that were used to deliver them: postal service; broadcast – television, radio, podcast, web page; and social media – blogs, wikis, facebook, twitter. It strikes me their model is useful, and their paper worth a read.

Anderson and Dron three generations summary

Anderson and Dron three generations summary

Terry Anderson and Jon Dron (2011). Three Generations of Distance Education Pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning Vol. 12.3 March – 2011
www.irrodl.org…  article

Posted in Emerging pedagogies | Leave a comment

Mobile uses: lecture capture

Mobile uses: lecture capture

Mobile uses: lecture capture

Who can take in stuff like this on the first pass? Not me. But if I can go and sit in the shade and run through it again in my own time… A wee trick: photographing off a laptop screen you can get a nasty moiré (interference pattern). Rotate the camera about 10° left or right before you press the button.

Posted in Mobile | Leave a comment

Anomaly detection

Week 9 of the ML-Class and I’m full of excitement over this week’s topic: Anomaly detection. I spend hundreds of hours studying stuff (AI, AL, ML) that’s cool, but I can’t see how I personally will ever get to use it. I mean, I’m never going to build a diesel-engined robotic dog that can carry a 250kg payload while autonomously avoiding or negotiating obstacles and programmed to gain its objective or self-destruct. But I can see how I would use anomaly detection in student user modeling to authenticate online examination candidates.

Posted in Commentary, Data mining, User modeling | Leave a comment

Privacy Issues

“I so try to encourage tutors to confine their online exchanges with students to Moodle’s forums and messaging. I explain that should a complaint ever be made against them by a student it will be so much in their interest to have access to a record of those exchanges. However, many continue to communicate in unaudited channels like personal email, facebook, twitter… do you know I’m probably just old-fashioned, suspicious… even paranoid.” This was my comment, reflecting on some “Important questions to ask…” in a recent posting by Matt Bury on LinkedIn

Posted in Commentary, Course administration | Leave a comment

Causality paradox

I’m trying to introduce the idea that we make (at least some of) our eLearning offerings free-and-open to showcase our mainstream programmes. This essentially is what Stanford have done with their ML-Class and their AI-Class that have attracted huge numbers, in what must be the biggest online learning experiment ever. Back to us… it’s one thing to be obsessed by making money (not to be hugely profitable, simply to survive), but it’s something of a leap of faith to think first of creating value and trusting that it will convert. I haven’t seen it better put than on John Langford’s blog Machine Learning (Theory): “The hard nosed will want to know how to make money, which is always a concern. But, a decent expectation is that if you first figure out how to create value, you’ll find some way to make money. And, if you first wait until it’s clear how to make money, you won’t make any. ”

I’d welcome any ideas for good arguments in favour of free (no fees) and open (no enrolment). Please do leave your comments.

Posted in Approaches, Commentary, Course administration, Course setups, Open Learning | Leave a comment

Blended in real time

I was privileged to sit in on JF’s NZ Dip Bus Contract Law class, and it was a bit of an eye-opener. This is blended learning in real time: delivered across two campuses mediated by video conferencing; Moodle lesson activity references the big text book the students all have; JF works through the lesson clarifying key points, answering questions, flagging up hazards. After the class there’s an asynchronous component: JF encourages students to share solutions in their Moodle blogs, and she posts model answers. This is really turbo-charged revision, as the students prepare for their final assessment.

Jottings: blended in real time

Jottings: blended in real time

The whole class runs like a dream (these are highly motivated students). I realise the camera has zoomed in on me, so I introduce myself. Voices are clear, though for the rest of the session the camera remains zoomed out and rather static (a tutor assistant/camera operator would be a great asset here). Is the session suitable for recording for later replay? Possibly not… though it works very well indeed in this synchronous phase of the delivery. The lesson activity is a step through, with a review question in there somewhere. Maybe it would benefit from a review question for each section, but one must be realistic about preparation time for these things… JF reckons she is already full time + 30%. The students voice their approval of the Moodle component. Why don’t other tutors make more use of this, they ask. Self-effacing, JF replies that some subjects lend themselves to it better than others. From the institution’s perspective it makes the small cohort at the remote campus viable. One can see an opportunity — where the subject matter is sufficiently generic — to deliver a course like this to students across several campuses simultaneously.

Jottings: Moodle references the standard text

Jottings: Moodle lesson references the standard text

The Moodle lesson references the course’s standard text, and also references some govt. websites. Could this be a real world application for the QR-Code bookmarking? One can see also an application for the electronic Smart Board here, with the tutor’s notes going straight down to Moodle.

Posted in Approaches, Course setups, Emerging pedagogies, Socratic arts | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Massively Parallel Education (MPE)

While education around the world moves forward each schoolday, nothing moves forward quite so impressively as a class with 140,000 students. It’s worth just reading this article about Peter Norvig and Sebastian Thrun teaching in Stanford’s open classroom environment.

Posted in Emerging pedagogies, Macro designs | Leave a comment

Werewolves

I have been advising clients to resist the temptation to extend and hack; stick to ‘Moodle out of the Box’ I say. In some cases I have had to defend my position quite vigorously. Way back in 1986 Fred Brooks wrote a now-famous essay No Silver Bullet. “Of all the monsters who fill the nightmares of our folklore,” he writes, “none terrify more than werewolves, because they transform unexpectedly from the familiar into horrors. For these, we seek bullets of silver that can magically lay them to rest.”

And when I read this posting on migration to Moodle 2 werewolves were invoked: “Do you know if there’s been any movement with Google integration with Moodle 2. Our 1.9 is integrated with Google and I can’t move until that’s sorted.” —David

Werewolves take on many scary shapes, among them:

  1. Documents lost in the labyrinth;
  2. Proliferation of unversioned documents;
  3. Insufficient resourcing to create question banks;
  4. SCORM page turners;
  5. Making twenty-five new user accounts between breakfast and start of class…

All have invoked their silver bullets, namely:

  1. Google Integration;
  2. SharePoint Integration;
  3. Hot Potatoes;
  4. Hacking the SCORM Module;
  5. Integration with Artena…

While I suggest the real solutions are:

  1. Moodle 2′s own repository feature;
  2. Moodle 2′s own repository feature;
  3. The GIFT format (built-in);
  4. Avoiding SCORM altogether;
  5. The manual creation of accounts by Student Services.

Well, it’s just my opinion, but that’s what a blog is.

Posted in Approaches, Commentary, Course administration, Course setups | Leave a comment

Khan Academy

Thanks to Matt Bury for introducing me to the Khan Academy. Especially useful for me on maths topics, but much much more on there too. A truly awesome free and open resource. The format is Captivate-style video with Voice of America-style instruction. Just excellent.

Their intro reads:

Watch. Practice. Learn almost anything for free. With a library of over 2,600 videos covering everything from arithmetic to physics, finance, and history and 210 practice exercises, we’re on a mission to help you learn what you want, when you want, at your own pace.

Posted in Emerging pedagogies, Open Learning | Leave a comment

Electrical pre-trade

fritzing.org

Interactive PCB Design

We presented to eleven Electrical pre-trade students, and it’s always interesting, because students never want what we think they want. Student surveys (that we do, anyway) always seem to point to students being conservative, assessment-driven, and really just wanting the shortest possible route to the qualification. Their message: Don’t muck about adding value… stick to core business!

We showed the students: Moodle; Fritzing; iCircuit.

Moodle

Of 11 students surveyed:

  • 9 wanted revision questions
  • 7 wanted simulations and visualisations
  • 5 wanted general discussion
  • 2 wanted industry links

Fritzing

Of 11 students surveyed:

  • 2 thought they would use it heaps
  • 5 thought they might use it
  • 3 thought they would not use it

iCircuit

Of 11 students surveyed:

  • 4 thought they would use it heaps
  • 5 thought they might use it
  • 2 thought they would not use it

Moodle is available anywhere, on any platform; Fritzing runs on the PC; and iCircuit runs only on the iPad and iPhone. It should be noted that Fritzing is well outside the scope of this pre-trade Level 2 course.

Posted in Approaches, Course setups, User modeling | Leave a comment